Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Week 3--Cameron Ormsby--Primary Source

I have decided to write my paper on smallpox inoculations in the 18th century, using Baron Thomas Dimsdale as a jumping off point. He was an articulate and zealous defender of the inoculations and published a number of texts on the subject. Many of these are scientific in nature, but he also published two texts that he wrote during his time in St. Petersburg at the request of Catherine the Great. There is also an excellent account of his second trip to Russia written by his wife that focuses less on the scientific aspects and more on the day to day logistics of their travels. I’d tentatively like to start with an introductory biographical sketch of Thomas Dimsdale. and then move into the debate surrounding smallpox inoculations. There were a number of religious qualms, fears about the dangers that it posed, and scientific debates over when in the year an inoculations should be administered and how old children had to be before receiving an inoculation. I can draw on a number of primary sources, many of them available online. Dimsdale, for example, published a short book on the subject, which then received a negative review from a Dr. John Lettsom. Dimsdale than published an article in response to that review, and Lettsom retaliated with a second article arguing his point. At this point I want to move to his trips to Russia, and his attempts to popularize the inoculation abroad. I can draw from his texts published in St. Petersburg and his wife’s diary, but I still need to find a couple more sources on this point. Then I’d like to explore how smallpox inoculations were viewed in non-British societies. I have some secondhand accounts of the Russian response from the Dimsdales themselves, but I think realistically it will be easiest to look at the American response. There is no shortage of secondary and primary sources available online and through jstor, and they have the advantage of being in English. The debate in America also closely ties to the American Revolution, because smallpox was a significant threat for General Washington’s troops. There’s an interesting letter from Jonathan Trumbull, the governor of Connecticut and captain-general in the army, complaining about the dangers of inoculation. I’m still trying to figure out how I can tie the debate in America to Dimsdale and his trip to Russia. Ideally, I’d like to find some sources by doctors who had traveled or emigrated to the United States and implemented the small pox inoculation in that society. In an effort to keep my paper closer to our travel theme, I’d also like to use the Russia and America examples as instances where travelers participated in an exchange of knowledge, looking at how smallpox inoculations ‘traveled,’ so to speak. Thoughts?

6 comments:

  1. Hey Cameron, I think it's a great idea to compare Russia and America this time. I took Richard White's class on the history of the North American West, of which smallpox had a great effect (Pox Americana was the text we used, covering the epidemic around the time of the revolution). I don't know what specific comparisons you could make, but just wanted to chime in on the impact of the disease on the Americun side.

    Otherwise, I think the history of inoculation is a very fascinating subject. I bet the misconceptions surrounding such a science are now laughably appealing. Seems like it should be a fun topic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since you have essentially two different authors writing about the same trips, it would be interesting if you could maybe take into account gender differences in the travel writing. I know this is not your focus, but I think it would be good to mention these gender differences maybe simply in relation to how they deal with the issue of small pox vaccines.

    ~Mackenzie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cool topic. I think it's especially nice that you have primary sources that begin a debate already. I don't think you need to worry about not being able to find sources on other countries. I think it will definitely be enough for you to compare attitudes between Russia and America. It will be very interesting to see how people thought of vaccination and diseases at that time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds like you have it all laid out really well! Check with Nancy, but she'd probably be okay with you diverging from 'travelers' a little bit to follow your passions on this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Cameron, just terrific! You are in great shape! You asked: How could you tie the debate in America to Dimsdale and his trip to Russia? I wish I knew more, but a question that might point to answers: Why did Dimsdale go to Russia rather than the US? If he was more hopeful for success in Russia, then you could use the US debates as a contrast that brings out what was distinctive about Russia in the first place. That might have the extra effect of subtly highlight the importance of your paper topic in the paper, which would also be nice. And even if his choice does not reflect a strong preference for Russia over the US, you could introduce the debates, again, to highlight why either his challenges or easy successes in Russia were distinctive to his local experience.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It definitely sounds interesting. It seems though, that it might be a bit too much to cover both Russia and America, but if you can do that in 20-25 pages, that's great!

    ReplyDelete