Outline for Paper
I. Introduction
A. grabber about James Frey’s fictionalized “A Million Little Pieces”
i. sensationalized/fictionalized aspects to sweeten his story’s melodramatic power and impact on his reader
B. not a new phenomenon—several early modern Europeans have false narratives
C. thesis: there are a variety of motivations (fame, money, or a desire to make known some societal commentary or point of view) behind these false narratives which have a certain set of common characteristics (author is dead, justifications for the veracity of the piece, lack of specific locations, etc). using this catalogue of traits, my hypothesis is that the primary source by T.S. seems of doubtful authenticity
*(this is my hypothesis but may not necessarily be my final thesis…I’m still in the research phase and so need to conduct more thorough readings of the other primary sources that I know are “false narratives”)
II. Overview of “The Adventures of an English Merchant, Taken Prisoner by the Turks of Argiers, and Carried into the Inland Countries of Africa”
A. name will be useless to the “judicious” reader and had an aversion from learning early on prompted him to become a solo traveler
B. eventually served as a slave for various Ottoman masters
C. secondary source, The Rise of Oriental Travel: English Visitors to the Ottoman Empire, raises some doubt but is inconclusive
i. therefore, this should piece should be examined
III. Examination of Known Travel Lies
A. definition: a tale told by a traveler or pseudo traveler with intent to deceive
B. Traits and Motivations from Joseph Marshall’s Travels through Holland, Flanders, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Lapland, Russia, the Ukraine and Poland in the Years 1768, 1769, and 1770
i. analysis primarily from secondary sources (e.g. “The Armchair Traveler”) *but work still needs to be done on secondary sources
C. Traits and Motivations from Sir Walter Raleigh’s Discoverie of the Large, Rich and Bewtifull Empire of Guiana;
i. analysis primarily from secondary sources *but work still needs to be done on secondary sources
D. Analysis from Adams’ Travelers and Travel Liars
i. in the 18th century, the age of geographic exploration and scientific curiosity, may have meant that people wrote their travel accounts to satisfy the scientific curiosity or to satisfy the “idle curiosity and the escapism” in certain countries
ii. motivations may have been vanity, monetary, and propagating point of view
E. catalogue of characteristics of false narratives
IV. Analysis of “The Adventures of an English Merchant”
A. characteristics of this piece
B. possible motivations?
C. juxtaposition of these traits with “known” travel lies
V. Conclusion
A. educated judgment on veracity of “The Adventures of an English Merchant”
B. description and possible explanation of the English slave narrative
i. other known English slave narratives to the Ottoman Empire
a. I want to explore the book “Ransom Slavery along the Ottoman Borders”. It’s twelve studies are organized around connected themes: the hunt for, the trade in and the treatment of captives in the Balkans and in Central Europe. While the focus of concern is on Hungary, ad some other border regions extending from the Crimea to Malta, it offers an analytic approach based on a great deal of so far unpublished Ottoman and European archival material. It will help me in my examination of Christian slavery in the Ottoman Empire. Also the time period of focus is from the early 15th-early 18th centuries.
b. I also want to look at the book “Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800”. The author calculates that roughly 1 to 1.25 million European Christians were captured and forced to work in North Africa from the 16th to 18th centuries. In fact, what caught my attention was the fact that the author argues that “through most of the 17th century the English lost at least 400 sailors a year to the slave traders” which could mean that my primary source may be telling the truth.
C. does this narrative reveal anything about English or Ottoman society? is this part of a sub genre of “Providential” rescue of Christians from the hands of an infidel? does this shed any light on the status of religion in England or the Ottoman Empire?
D. effects of false travel narratives on society?
i. affected national politics (230 Adams)
ii. influenced religion and philosophy
iii. affected natural sciences
E. if this is proven false, what shall we do with travel accounts that contain errors and report legends, that give false impressions through ignorance or bad judgments?
Hey Jimmy, this looks like a comprehensive outline with a lot of good sources. I think you have an interesting (tentative) thesis and your approach seems to be the correct one to take.
ReplyDeleteI think the part that seemed most interesting to me was the effects of false travel narratives on society. I know that's more of an afterthought considering you're mainly trying to prove a specific source's validity (or lack thereof). However, if you feel you've substantiated your original claim enough, I think this would be a great sector to research and report on.
You've got a ton of sources; this is definitely a good thing, but I'd probably approach them pretty analytically. Maybe you could use a long checklist of possible hints that it's a false narrative, and then use this same rubric for all of the sources and see where the overlaps lay. Just a suggestion.
Overall though it looks like you know where you're going!
Your secondary sources on Christian slavery in the Ottoman Empire sound really interesting! I feel like you've got the whole false narrative arc fairly fleshed out, even if you're still looking for secondary sources. I feel like much of the actual analysis is in your conclusion right now, which isn't a bad thing, but you might want to think about having a multi-paragraph conclusion. Also, I might move the research you've done on slavery up into the main body of your essay. After all, comparing the realities of slavery to what your author claims he experienced would be another good way to analyze if his account was true or not!
ReplyDeleteHey Jimmy,
ReplyDeleteNice work on organizing all of this. I think it was smart to use secondary sources primarily for analysis for the false accounts even if you haven't found everything yet. This will cut down the research a lot.
One thing that might be helpful, if not as interesting as slavery at the time, is to just look at geography and see if the logistics of TS's trip are possible. I've heard of a couple of accounts being found out that way.
This isn't relevant at all, but I read that one man's false account was found out when his "wife" published her account of the same travels. Turns out he had changed things around and left out a lot of details so that his real wife wouldn't find out he married another woman in Russia!
I really liked the last question you asked
ReplyDelete"if this is proven false, what shall we do with travel accounts that contain errors and report legends, that give false impressions through ignorance or bad judgments?"
I think when looking at false narratives its important to look at what it can give us, or can it give us anything? Does this false narrative expose anything the society it is accounting or does it just expose things from the author's own society?
I think your outline is well organized and your definitely on track!
Mackenzie
You seem to have a clear idea of what it is you're comparing this source to. I think your conclusion may be a little long. Maybe you should consider moving the books on the slave narrative to the main part of your paper since you are, after all, using them to evaluate your primary source's veracity.
ReplyDeleteHi Jimmy,
ReplyDeleteYour outline looks good. I think it's a pretty challenging project to judge whether an account is true, but very important! Looking at other accounts that we know are true or false to see what traits they have in common with the account you're focusing on seems like a good idea. Suggestions for what you could list as directions of further research: Why did he fictionalize the account? What was he hoping to achieve? Does it show anything about the culture of his home country? What are the uses and pitfalls of studying travel accounts? Can we ever be confident of their accuracy? Does it matter, and why?
Hi Jimmy,
ReplyDeleteIt seems the main point of your hypothesis - proving one way or the other the authenticity of TS's account - is all contained in the 'conclusion' section here. You have some good points, but I think you'll need to work on the structure a lot before you sit down to write it - specifically, using a few main sections to all support your thesis, rather than a progression to your analytical analysis and support all at the end. I guess you'll have to see how many pages you can get out of each section, but you might even want to have the discussion of various motivations for and common characteristics of false travel narratives as a context/background section (though a long one), and then divide your TS analysis into longer subsections and make it the body of your paper. Just a thought though, since you say you're still doing research.
Hey Jimmy,
ReplyDeleteIt all looks good. I was wondering if you have any information about the reception of this account? That would allow you to talk about its importance even though it is "probably" a false account.